Browsing by Author "Antunes, I."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms and Blood Transfusion. What do We Need?Publication . Machado, R.; Loureiro, L.; Antunes, I.; Coutinho, J.; Almeida, R.INTRODUCTION: Comparatively to open repair, endovascular aneurysm repair has reduced transfusion rates but thereâs no recommendation about number of red blood cells units to be crossmatched preoperatively. Our aim is contribute to the analysis of red blood cells units needs in endovascular and hybrid aortic aneurysm repair and developing a protocol for maximum surgical blood orders schedule. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our prospective database of elective endovascular aneurysm repair from 2001 to 2012. We analyzed patients' age, gender, ASA classification, maximum surgical blood orders schedule, red blood cells units transfused and timings, types of endoprosthesis, red blood cells units consumption/endoprosthesis' type ratio, crossmatch to transfusion ratio, conversion to open repair, hemoglobin concentrations before surgery and discharge. RESULTS: We selected 187 patients, 90% men, mean age 73.1, ASA mode III. The endoprosthesis were aorto-bi-iliac in 71%, aorto-uni-iliac in 23% and thoracic in 6%. Of these, 72,6% of the patients did not require blood transfusion. We transfused 171 red blood cells units. Crossmatch to transfusion ratio was 10.1 until 2010 and 7.3 after. The ratio of red blood cells units consumption/endoprosthesis in the first 24 hours was 0.21 red blood cells units/aorto-bi-iliac, 0.46 red blood cells units/aorto-uni-iliac, 0.8 red blood cells units/thoracic, 1.3 red blood cells units/hybrid-thoracic and 2 red blood cells units/hybrid-aorto-bi-iliac. A statistical correlation was observed between red blood cells units transfused postoperatively and type of endoprosthesis (p < 0.001) and between ASA classification and red blood cells units transfused after 24 hours (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Guidelines from the British Society of Haematology are based on a crossmatch to transfusion ratio of 2:1. Our crossmatch to transfusion ratio was 10.1 until 2010 and 7.3 from 2011 to 2012. CONCLUSION: These results changed our policy of maximum surgical blood orders schedule for endovascular aneurysm repair. We now type and screen aorto-bi-iliac and aorto-uni-iliac. We crossmatch two red blood cells units for thoracic, three red blood cells units for hybrid thoracic and four red blood cells units for hybrid abdominal procedures. This may lead to financial savings, improved efficiency and reduce workload in hematology department.
- Institutional Impact of EVAR's Incorporation in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: a 12 Years' Experience AnalysisPublication . Machado, R.; Antunes, I.; Oliveira, P.; Pereira, C.; Almeida, R.Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was introduced as a less aggressive treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for patients ineligible for open repair (OR). Objective: To analyze EVAR's incorporation impact in the treatment of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms in our institution. Methods: A retrospective study of the patients with diagnostic of infra-renal AAA treated between December 2001 and December 2013 was performed. The choice between EVAR and OR was based on surgeon's experience, considering patient clinical risk and aneurysm's anatomical features. Patients treated by EVAR and by OR were analyzed. In each group, patient's and aneurysm's characteristics, surgical and anesthesia times, cost, transfusion rate, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality and re-intervention rates and survival curves were evaluated. Results: The mean age, all forms of heart disease and chronic renal failure were more common in EVAR group. Blood transfusion, surgical and anesthesia times and mean hospital stay were higher for OR. Intraoperative complications rate was higher for endovascular aneurysm repair, overall during hospitalization complication rate was higher for open repair. The average cost in endovascular aneurysm repair was 1448.3€ higher. Re-interventions rates within 30 days and late re-intervention were 4.1% and 11.7% for endovascular aneurysm repair versus 13.7% and 10.6% for open repair. Conclusions: Two different groups were treated by two different techniques. The individualized treatment choice allows to achieve a mortality of 2.7%. Age ≥80 years influences survival curve in OR group and ASA ≥IV in EVAR group. We believe EVAR's incorporation improved the results of OR itself. Patients with more comorbidities were treated by endovascular aneurysm repair, decreasing those excluded from treatment. Late reinterventions were similar for both techniques.