Browsing by Author "Ferreira, Daniela"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Hemostatic spray as therapy for pancreatic stump bleeding after cephalic duodenopancreatectomyPublication . Falc�o, Daniela; Ferreira, Daniela; Maia, Luís; Sadio, Ana; Pedroto, IsabelA 70-year-old man with a cholangiocarcinoma underwent a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy. On the 2nd postoperative day, he had hematemesis without hemodynamic instability. Upper endoscopy (EGD) revealed a massive clot at the pancreatic stump, suspected as the source of hemorrhage. After partial clot removal, no active bleeding was found and no therapy was performed. Pancreaticogastric and gastrojejunal anastomoses, as well as the efferent-limb, showed no suspicious lesions. Octreotide was initiated and heparin prophylaxis was temporarily stopped. Bleeding from pancreatic stump following pancreatoduodenectomy is a rare but a life-threatening condition. Conventional endoscopic therapies, including clip placement and cautery, are mostly ineffective and with high risk of pancreatitis. We report the second case of hemostatic powder as a safe and successful therapy in this scenario.
- Tofacitinib-induced eosinophiliaPublication . Archer, Sara; Ferreira, Daniela; Ferreira, Ana Teresa; Ponte, Sofia; Caetano, Cidalina; Salgado, Marta; Lago, Paula; Pedroto, IsabelTofacitinib is an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in phase III clinical trials and supported by real-life data. We report the case of an 18-year-old woman with a 1-year diagnosis of left-sided UC, with multiple admissions due to disease exacerbation or infections, refractory to infliximab (with azathioprine) and currently under treatment with vedolizumab and tacrolimus. She was admitted due to a severe disease exacerbation and, because of a previous history of neuropsychiatric side effects to corticotherapy, tofacitinib was initiated. In the following 6 days, there was no clinical improvement of UC, and serial blood work-up revealed moderate grade persistent peripheral eosinophilia (3000 cells/mm3) and acute kidney injury grade 1 KDIGO. Tofacitinib temporary suspension was decided, with a rapid normalization of renal function/eosinophil levels. Tofacitinib was restarted 2 days after its suspension. However, she developed moderate eosinophilia (2000 cells/mm3) again, which was considered an adverse effect (AE) to tofacitinib, leading to its suspension with eosinophilia resolution. Given the severity of the disease, after a multidisciplinary discussion, it was decided to start high-dose corticotherapy and ustekinumab with maintenance therapy every 4 weeks, and to add tacrolimus. Clinical and biochemical remission were achieved, and the patient was discharged. Three-month follow-up after tofacitinib suspension showed no recrudescence of eosinophilia. Tofacitinib represents a significant advance in the management of UC patients. The drug has a good safety profile with few related AE. This case aims to warn about an adverse reaction to tofacitinib not reported so far, including in a multicenter real-life setting recently published by Hernández et al where eosinophilia is also not described, thus emphasizing the rarity of this AE. To our knowledge this is the first case of tofacitinib-induced eosinophilia in the context of UC.