Browsing by Author "Gomes, R."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Paraplegia espástica familiar tipo 4 – antecipação ou variabilidade fenotípica?Publication . Rodrigues, N.; Ferreira, S.; Rodrigues, L.; Castro, A.; Barbosa, C.; Gomes, R.Introdução: A Paraplegia Espástica Familiar (PEF) é um grupo heterogéneo de doenças neurodegenerativas hereditárias, com uma prevalência de 2/100000 indivíduos na população portuguesa. Caracteriza-se sobretudo por espasticidade progressiva e insidiosa dos membros inferiores, por degeneração do feixe corticoespinhal. Caso Clínico: Apresentamos uma criança com espasticidade e hiperreflexia progressivas dos membros inferiores, com vários familiares da linha paterna com sintomatologia semelhante, sugerindo ao diagnóstico de paraplegia espástica familiar. Foi identificada no probando uma mutação causal de paraplegia espástica familiar tipo 4. Conclusão: Nesta família, a idade de início variou entre os cinco e os 50 anos, e diminuiu em média 22,5 anos ao longo de três gerações e, por outro lado, a apresentação e evolução da doença foram aparentemente mais graves em gerações sucessivas, sugerindo a existência de fenómeno de antecipação. ABSTRACT Introduction: Hereditary spastic paraplegia is a heterogeneous group of inherited neurodegenerative diseases, with a prevalence of 2/100000 in the Portuguese population. It is mainly characterized by progressive and insidious spasticity of the lower limbs due to degeneration of corticospinal tracts. Case Report: We present a child with progressive spasticity and hyperreflexia of lower limbs, with several relatives of the paternal line with similar symptoms, suggesting the diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia. A causing mutation of hereditary spastic paraplegia type 4 was identified in the proband. Conclusion: In this family, the age of onset varies from five to 50 years, and decreased in average 22,5 years over three generations. The clinical presentation and progression apparently tended to be more severe in successive generations, witch these suggests the phenomenon of anticipation.
- Patient-physician discordance in assessment of adherence to inhaled controller medication: a cross-sectional analysis of two cohortsPublication . Jácome, C.; Pereira, A.; Almeida, R.; Ferreira-Magalhães, Manuel; Couto, M.; Araujo, L.; Pereira, M.; Correia, M.; Loureiro, C.; Catarata, M.; Maia Santos, L.; Pereira, J.; Ramos, B.; Lopes, C.; Mendes, A.; Cidrais Rodrigues, J.; Oliveira, G.; Aguiar, A.; Afonso, I.; Carvalho, J.; Arrobas, A.; Coutinho Costa, J.; Dias, J.; Todo Bom, A.; Azevedo, J.; Ribeiro, C.; Alves, M.; Leiria Pinto, P.; Neuparth, N.; Palhinha, A.; Gaspar Marques, J.; Pinto, N.; Martins, P.; Todo Bom, F.; Alvarenga Santos, M.; Gomes Costa, A.; Silva Neto, A.; Santalha, M.; Lozoya, C.; Santos, N.; Silva, D.; Vasconcelos, M.; Taborda-Barata, L.; Carvalhal, C.; Teixeira, M.; Alves, R.; Moreira, A.; Sofia Pinto, C.; Morais Silva, P.; Alves, C.; Câmara, R.; Coelho, D.; Bordalo, D.; Fernandes, R.; Ferreira, R.; Menezes, F.; Gomes, R.; Calix, M.; Marques, A.; Cardoso, J.; Emiliano, M.; Gerardo, R.; Nunes, C.; Câmara, R.; Ferreira, J.; Carvalho, A.; Freitas, P.; Correia, R.; Fonseca, J.Objective: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. Design: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. Setting: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. Participants: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. Measures: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. Results: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). Conclusion: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement.