Repository logo
 
Publication

3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging

dc.contributor.authorCastro-Poças, F.
dc.contributor.authorDinis-Ribeiro, M.
dc.contributor.authorRocha, A.
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, T.
dc.contributor.authorPedroto, I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-18T13:58:55Z
dc.date.available2020-03-18T13:58:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.description.abstractBackground: rectal cancer staging using rigid probes or echoendoscopes has some limitations. The aim of the study was to compare rectal cancer preoperative staging using conventional endoluminal ultrasonography with three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and miniprobes. Materials and methods: sixty patients were included and evaluated with: a) a conventional echoendoscope (7.5 and 12 MHz); b) miniprobes (12 MHz); and c) the Easy 3D Freescan software for three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography. The reference or gold standard was conventional endoluminal ultrasonography in all cases and pathological assessment for those without preoperative therapy. The differences in T and N staging accuracy in both longitudinal and circumferential extension were evaluated. Results: with regard to T staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 85% (compared to pathological analysis), and the agreement between miniprobes vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (kappa = 0.81) and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.87) was significant. In addition, miniprobes had an accuracy of 82% and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had a higher accuracy (96%). With regard to N staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 91% with a sensitivity of 78%. However, the agreement between miniprobes and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.70) was lower. Interestingly, miniprobes had a lower accuracy of 81% whereas three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had an accuracy of 100% without any false negative. No false positives were observed in any of the techniques. Accuracy for T and N staging was not influenced by longitudinal or circumferential extensions of the tumor in all types of endoscopic ultrasonography analyzed. Conclusions: miniprobes and especially three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography may be relevant during rectal cancer staging.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationCastro-Poças F, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rocha A, Araújo T, Pedroto I. 3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018;110(5):306–310.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.17235/reed.2018.4453/2016pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1130-0108
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2331
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherAran Edicionespt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.reed.es/ArticuloFicha.aspx?id=1382&hst=0&idR=60&tp=1&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1pt_PT
dc.subjectHuman colonpt_PT
dc.subjectMiniprobespt_PT
dc.subjectEndoscopic Ultrasonographypt_PT
dc.subjectIntestinal wallpt_PT
dc.title3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer stagingpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceSpainpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage310pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue5pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage306pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleRevista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivapt_PT
oaire.citation.volume110pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging.pdf
Size:
842.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.35 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: