Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparative clinical and radiologic evaluation between patients undergoing standard reversed shoulder arthroplasty or bony increased offset

dc.contributor.authorAmorim-Barbosa, Tiago
dc.contributor.authorRibau, Ana
dc.contributor.authorFonte, Hélder
dc.contributor.authorHenrique Barros, Luís
dc.contributor.authorClaro, Rui
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T14:47:09Z
dc.date.available2024-07-04T14:47:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.description.abstractBackground: Modifications of the medialized design of Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using a bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) has shown better clinical results and fewer complications. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results, complications, and radiological outcomes between patients undergoing standard RSA and BIO-RSA. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 42 RSA procedures (22 standard RSA and 20 BIO-RSA). With a minimum of 1 year of follow-up, range of motion (ROM), Constant shoulder score (CSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and subjective shoulder score (SSS) were compared. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan were examined for scapular notching, glenoid and humeral fixation, and graft healing. Results: At a mean follow-up of 27.6 months (range, 12-48 months), a significant difference was found for active-internal rotation (P=0.038) and for passive-external rotation (P=0.013), with better results in BIO-RSA. No other differences were found in ROM, CSS (P=0.884), VAS score, and SSS. Graft healing and viability were verified in all patients with CT scan (n=34). The notching rate was 28% in the standard RSA group and 33% in the BIO-RSA group, but the standard RSA had more severe notching (grade 2) than BIO-RSA (P=0.039). No other significative differences were found in glenoid and humeral fixation. Conclusions: Bone-graft lateralization is associated with better internal and external rotation and with less severe scapular notching compared to the standard RSA. Integration of the bone graft occurs effectively, with no relevant changes observed on radiographic evaluation.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationAmorim-Barbosa T, Ribau A, Fonte H, Barros LH, Claro R. Comparative clinical and radiologic evaluation between patients undergoing standard reversed shoulder arthroplasty or bony increased offset. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023;26(1):3-9. doi:10.5397/cise.2022.01270pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.5397/cise.2022.01270pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2383-8337
dc.identifier.issn2288-8721
dc.identifier.issn1226-9344
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/3004
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherKorean Shoulder and Elbow Societypt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.01270pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplastypt_PT
dc.subjectGlenoid bone graftpt_PT
dc.subjectGlenoid lateralizationpt_PT
dc.subjectScapular notchingpt_PT
dc.subjectReverse shoulder arthroplastypt_PT
dc.titleComparative clinical and radiologic evaluation between patients undergoing standard reversed shoulder arthroplasty or bony increased offsetpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceKoreapt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage9pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue1pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage3pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleClinics in Shoulder and Elbowpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume26pt_PT
person.familyNameAmorim Barbosa
person.familyNameCosta Ribau
person.familyNameFonte
person.familyNameBarros
person.familyNameClaro
person.givenNameTiago
person.givenNameAna Isabel
person.givenNameHélder
person.givenNameLuís
person.givenNameRui
person.identifierhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=3DxjkXsAAAAJ&hl=pt-PT&oi=ao
person.identifier.ciencia-id8410-E39C-7E04
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1880-9417
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6087-942X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8009-8305
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7629-2917
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4836-2994
person.identifier.ridE-9517-2018
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57218453340
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57214342667
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd296b25f-fc30-49f1-a637-9c1b9f640c2a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication887620f2-12aa-49d2-9cad-90c1e4f621d1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3b623289-0577-4699-a0f4-e7cac2a373fe
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc300a1c9-648b-4977-b27b-83d128a14a30
relation.isAuthorOfPublication90f63ae5-76f7-429f-bfd6-1597763d5ed4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery887620f2-12aa-49d2-9cad-90c1e4f621d1

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amorim-barbosa-2023-Comparative-clinical-and-radiologic.pdf
Size:
535.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: