Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparison of questionnaire and accelerometer-based assessments of physical activity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical and prognostic implications

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Cristine
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Mario
dc.contributor.authorBohn, Lucimere
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Bruno Miguel
dc.contributor.authorMoreira-Gonçalves, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLeite-Moreira, Adelino
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, José
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T13:23:25Z
dc.date.available2022-07-12T13:23:25Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective. (i) To compare daily physical activity (PA) levels evaluated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and by triaxial accelerometry in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients; (ii) to describe daily PA patterns based in objective measurements; and (iii) to observe the association between prognostic indicators and PA measurements. Design. This is a cross-sectional study with 24 stable HFpEF patients. PA was assessed through the IPAQ short version and triaxial accelerometer. Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) from IPAQ was computed as self-reported walking and MVPA. Prognostic indicators were: distance on the 6-minute-walking test (6MWT), oxygen consumption (VO2) during the test, quality of life (QoL), BNP plasma level, and E/e' ratio. Results. Compared to accelerometry, IPAQ underestimated sedentary time (253 ± 156 vs. 392 ± 104 min/day, p = .001) and overestimated MVPA (44 ± 56 vs. 19.3 ± 26 min/day, p < .001). Accelerometer-derived data showed that HFpEF patients spent 50% of their waking time in sedentary behaviours and 2.5% in MVPA. Of measured surrogate prognostic markers, functional capacity (6MWT, r = 0.652, p = .04; VO2, r = 0.512, p = .02) and QoL (r=-0.490, p = .04) were correlated with MVPA. Conclusions. The IPAQ underestimated sedentary time and over-estimated MVPA in HFpEF patients. Using accelerometer-derived data, HFpEF patients spent only a minority of their time involved in MVPA, which was the only PA pattern positively associated with prognostic indicators.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt C, Santos M, Bohn L, et al. Comparison of questionnaire and accelerometer-based assessments of physical activity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical and prognostic implications. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020;54(2):77-83. doi:10.1080/14017431.2019.1707863pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14017431.2019.1707863pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1401-7431
dc.identifier.issn1651-2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2716
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispt_PT
dc.relationCardiovascular Research and Development Center
dc.relationResearch Center in Physical Actity Health and Leisure
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14017431.2019.1707863pt_PT
dc.subjectHFpEFpt_PT
dc.subjectIPAQpt_PT
dc.subjectaccelerometerpt_PT
dc.subjectphysical activitypt_PT
dc.subjectprognostic indicatorspt_PT
dc.titleComparison of questionnaire and accelerometer-based assessments of physical activity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical and prognostic implicationspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardTitleCardiovascular Research and Development Center
oaire.awardTitleResearch Center in Physical Actity Health and Leisure
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID%2FIC%2F00051%2F2019/PT
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID%2FDTP%2F00617%2F2019/PT
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceEnglandpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage83pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue2pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage77pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleScandinavian Cardiovascular Journalpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume54pt_PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
person.familyNameSantos
person.givenNameMario
person.identifier.ciencia-idCB17-AD56-DE37
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4509-0260
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7cf7a05b-3af4-4eaf-b3b5-9021cb7a2629
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7cf7a05b-3af4-4eaf-b3b5-9021cb7a2629
relation.isProjectOfPublicationb9cdb544-1d16-4a1f-a63c-4696f38453b4
relation.isProjectOfPublicationbed0e049-044d-4f25-b992-363cc9810e55
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb9cdb544-1d16-4a1f-a63c-4696f38453b4

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Schmidt - 2020 b - Comparison of questionnaire and accelerometer.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.35 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: