Loading...
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- The Caloric Necessities of Critical Care Patients During the First Week of AdmissionPublication . Pinto Medeiros, Rita; Ramos de Sousa, Ricardo Filipe; Santos Silva, Mariana; Rego, Rita; Torrao, Cristina; Amaral, Inês; Pereira, Rita; Pinho, João P; Marinho, Ricardo Cleto; Marinho, AnibalIntroduction: The nutritional needs of critically ill patients have been the subject of intense controversy. In accordance with international guidelines, it is advocated to optimize a nutritional intake based on the following recommendation: 25-30 kcal/kg body weight per day. However, there still are authors who recommend permissive underfeeding in the first week of hospitalization. Nevertheless, energy expenditure (EE) and necessity are influenced by the catabolic phase of critical illness, which may vary over time on a patient and from patient to patient. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess if the energy needs of critically ill patients admitted in our intensive care unit (ICU) in the first week of hospitalization are in line with those recommended by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) international guidelines. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out from September to December 2019. The energy needs were evaluated by indirect calorimetry and by the Harris-Benedict equation. Stress variables were evaluated, namely, the type of pathology, hemodynamic support, sedation, temperature, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and state at discharge. Results: Forty-six patients were included in this study, with an average energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry of 19.22 ± 4.67 kcal/kg/day. The energy expenditure was less than 20 kcal/kg/day in 63% of the measurements. The concordance rate did not show the relationship between the Harris-Benedict equation and the values of indirect calorimetry. Stress variables were analyzed, with the SOFA score as the only variable with values close to statistical significance. Conclusion: In our ICU, the energy needs of critically ill patients in the first week of hospitalization are lower than the intake recommended by the guidelines.
- Prevalence of Nutritional Risk at Admission in Internal Medicine Wards in Portugal: The Multicentre Cross-Sectional ANUMEDI StudyPublication . Marinho, Ricardo; Pessoa, Ana; Lopes, Marta; Rosinhas, João; Pinho, João; Silveira, Joana; Amado, Ana; Silva, Sandra; Oliveira, Bruno; Marinho, Anibal; Jager-Wittenaar, HarriëtIntroduction: Disease-related undernutrition is highly prevalent and requires timely intervention. However, identifying undernutrition often relies on physician judgment. As Internal Medicine wards are the backbone of the hospital setting, insight into the prevalence of nutritional risk in this population is essential. We aimed to determine the prevalence of nutritional risk in Internal Medicine wards, to identify its correlates, and to assess the agreement between the physicians' impression of nutritional risk and evaluation by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Material and methods: A cross-sectional multicentre study was performed in Internal Medicine wards of 24 Portuguese hospitals during 2017. Data on demographics, previous hospital admissions, primary diagnosis, and Charlson comorbidity index score were collected. Nutritional risk at admission was assessed using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Agreement between physicians' impression of nutritional risk and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was tested by Cohen's kappa. Results: The study included 729 participants (mean age 74 ± 14.6 years, 51% male). The main reason for admission was respiratory disease. Mean Charlson comorbidity index score was 5.8 ± 2.8. Prevalence of nutritional risk was 51%. Nutritional risk was associated with admission during the previous year (odds ratio = 1.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 - 2.24), solid tumour with metastasis (odds ratio = 4.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.06 - 10.87), any tumour without metastasis (odds ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval:1.24 - 3.34), kidney disease (odds ratio = 1.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.21 - 2.75), peptic ulcer (odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 - 4.25), heart failure (odds ratio = 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 - 2.04), dementia (odds ratio = 3.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.96 - 4.64), and cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 - 2.35). Agreement between physicians' evaluation of nutritional status and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was weak (Cohen's kappa = 0.415, p < 0.001). Discussion: Prevalence of nutritional risk in the Internal Medicine population is very high. Admission during the previous year and multiple comorbidities increase the odds of being at-risk. Subjective physician evaluation is not appropriate for nutritional screening. Conclusion: The high prevalence of at-risk patients and poor subjective physician evaluation suggest the need to implement mandatory nutritional screening.