Loading...
4 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyesPublication . Coelho, João; Malheiro, Luisa; Melo Beirão, João; Meireles, Angelina; Pessoa, BernardetePurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term real-world effectiveness of FAc and DEX implants in vitrectomized DME eyes in a real-world setting. Methods: This was a non-interventional, retrospective, comparative study of 46 vitrectomized eyes in 33 patients with persistent or recurrent DME quantified best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) over up to 37 months. Results: Both FAc and DEX treatment led to statistically and clinically significant improvements in BCVA and CFT. FAc >10-letter improvement on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] chart over months 3-24 and a sustained ~200 µm CFT reduction over months 1-24; DEX: >5-letter improvement on the ETDRS chart at months 1 and 3 and >100 µm CFT reduction at month 1. FAc demonstrated sustained, stable and predictable effects on BCVA and CFT over 24 months and also improved BCVA and decreased CFT in a cohort of DME eyes that was refractory to DEX over 6 months. Conclusion: This real-world study demonstrates long-term effectiveness of FAc in vitrectomized DME eyes and sustained effectiveness in DME eyes that did not respond to DEX therapy.
- Enzymatic vitreolysis for the treatment of tractional diabetic macular edemaPublication . Pessoa, Bernardete; Coelho, João; Coelho, Constança; Monteiro, Sílvia; Abreu, Carolina; Figueira, João; Meireles, Angelina; Beirão, JoãoBackground: A new approach to address focal vitreomacular adhesion in patients with diabetic macular edema may control and stabilize diabetic macular edema with fewer anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that diabetic macular edema can be improved by inducing the release of a vitreomacular adhesion, with less than 2500 μm, with enzymatic vitreolysis. Methods: From a retrospective analysis of clinical records from patients with diabetic retinopathy, patients with diabetic macular edema and vitreomacular adhesion <2500 μm were selected for a single-arm prospective study. The primary endpoint was to control diabetic macular edema with fewer anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections after an observed vitreomacular adhesion release. A statistical subanalysis was performed for the following two groups: the group with vitreomacular adhesion release (group 1) and the group without vitreomacular adhesion release (group 2). Results: A total of 23 eyes from 19 patients were included. A reduction of the median number of injections was achieved in group 1 (p = 0.006). Adverse events were mild and transitory. Conclusion: Release of vitreomacular adhesion <2500 μm through enzymatic vitreolysis contributed to the control and stabilization of diabetic macular edema with fewer anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, reducing the burden and the risks related to these invasive and frequently chronic treatments.
- Microperimetry as Part of Multimodal Assessment to Evaluate and Monitor Myopic Traction MaculopathyPublication . Baptista, Pedro Manuel; Silva, Nisa; Coelho, João; José, Diana; Almeida, Daniel; Meireles, AngelinaPurpose: To characterize a population of high myopes with myopic traction maculopathy (MTM), to assess their retinal function, and to correlate it with anatomic status. Patients and methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study including 50 eyes from 27 patients. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Macular structure was assessed with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Heidelberg®) and macular function was studied with Microperimeter MP-3, NIDEK®. Results: The average for central foveal thickness (CFT) and choroid thickness (CT) was 213±151 μm and 36±23 μm, respectively, in a total of 50 eyes from 27 patients. In the microperimetry analysis, the average sensitivity on the foveal-centered 12º polygon (CPS) was 14.37±9.1 dB. CT was negatively associated with the bivariate contour ellipse areas (BCEA) 1 (r=-0.314; p=0.034), 2 (r=-0.314; p=0.034), and 3 (r=-0.316; p=0.033). CPS had a strong positive correlation with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (r=0.661; p=0.000). We found a trend to worse microperimetric results in eyes with schisis (n=19) (p>0.05) but eyes with atrophic areas (n=33) presented significant inferior CPS (p<0.001). The presence of staphyloma showed significant impact on macular sensitivities in eyes with areas of macular atrophy/fibrosis (p<0.05). Conclusion: Macular microperimetry analysis can have a role as part of a multimodal anatomo-functional assessment for a more precise characterization of the high myopic patients with MTM, optimizing medical and surgical decisions.
- Intravitreal Ranibizumab or Aflibercept After Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema: Exploratory Retrospective AnalysisPublication . Pessoa, Bernardete; Malheiro, Luisa; Carneiro, Inês; Monteiro, Sílvia; Coelho, João; Coelho, Constança; Figueira, João P; Meireles, Angelina; Beirão, JoãoAim: To evaluate the efficacy of switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab or aflibercept in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) unresponsive to bevacizumab. Methods: Single-center retrospective comparative study of patients with DME unresponsive to intravitreal bevacizumab that was switched to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were analysed prior to and 4 months after the switch. Ocular coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers were also analysed. Results: Fifty-six eyes from 40 patients were included in the study, 33 eyes switched to ranibizumab and 23 to aflibercept. A significant median CFT decrease was observed in both groups (p<0.001), with no between-group differences. BCVA gain was only significant in the ranibizumab group (p<0.001). None of the pre-baseline or baseline parameters were associated with the response to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Conclusion: In persistent DME unresponsive to bevacizumab, both anatomical and functional improvements were observed with ranibizumab whereas aflibercept only showed an anatomical improvement. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04018833.