Loading...
3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Different disease, same challenges: Social determinants of tuberculosis and COVID-19Publication . Duarte, R.; Aguiar, A.; Pinto, M.; Furtado, Inês; Tiberi, S.; Lönnroth, K.; Migliori, G.B.Infectious diseases, such as tuberculosis (TB) and the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) relate to environmental factors, understanding of which is essential to inform policy and practice and tackle them effectively. The review follows the conceptual framework offered by the World Health Organization Commission on Social Determinants of Health (defined as "all those material, psychological and behavioural circumstances linked to health and generically indicated as risk factors' in the conventional epidemiological language"). It describes the social factors behind TB and COVID-19, the commonalities between the two diseases, and what can be learned so far from the published best practices. The social determinants sustaining TB and COVID-19 underline the importance of prioritising health and allocating adequate financial and human resources to achieve universal health coverage and health-related social protection while addressing the needs of vulnerable populations. Rapid and effective measures against poverty and other major social determinants and sources of inequality are urgently needed to develop better health in the post-COVID-19 world.
- Transitioning intravenous epoprostenol to oral selexipag in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a case reportPublication . Alexandre, André; Furtado, Inês; Gonçalves, Fabienne; Gonçalves, Fabienne; Melo, Alzira; Alves, Joana; Santos, Mario; Reis, AbilioIntravenous (i.v.) prostacyclin is the cornerstone treatment in high-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. Selexipag is an orally available prostacyclin receptor agonist. Limited data are available regarding the feasibility of transitioning from i.v. epoprostenol to selexipag. A 50-year-old woman with idiopathic PAH was diagnosed in a World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC) IV. She improved with upfront triple combination therapy, including i.v. epoprostenol. Over 2 years of follow-up, the patient remained at low risk and expressed strong preference towards oral therapies. After careful risk-benefit clinical consideration, she was transitioned from i.v. epoprostenol to selexipag. Selexipag was started at dosage of 200 μg twice daily (b.i.d.) and titrated up to 1600 μg b.i.d. over 8 weeks (up-titration of 200 μg b.i.d. every week). Simultaneously, i.v. epoprostenol was down-titrated 3.0 ng/kg/min every week from a dosage of 27.5 ng/kg/min. The transition occurred under strict medical surveillance and was well tolerated. One year after discontinuation of epoprostenol, the patient remains in WHO FC I and has no signs of clinical deterioration. Although not generalizable to most PAH patients, this case highlights that a carefully planned transition from epoprostenol to selexipag is feasible in selected low-risk patients within a shared medical decision-making framework.
- Disability and its clinical correlates in pulmonary hypertension measured through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: a prospective, observational studyPublication . Reis, Abílio; Santos, Mario; Furtado, Inês; Cruz, Célia; Sá-couto, Pedro; Queirós, Alexandra; Almeida, Luis; Rocha, NelsonObjective: To characterise the degree of disability in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients based on the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Method: A prospective and observational study of patients with documented PH (N = 46). Patients completed the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire during a scheduled routine clinical visit, and their demographic and clinical characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records (EMR). In subsequent visits, selected clinical variables were registered to assess disease progression. Results: WHODAS 2.0 scores were indicative of mild to moderate disability for the domains of mobility (22.0 ± 23.2), life activities (23.7 ± 25.5), and participation in society (17.2 ± 15.9), as well as total WHODAS 2.0 score (15.3 ± 15.2). For the domains of cognition (9.1 ± 14.1), self-care (8.3 ± 14.4), and interpersonal relationships (11.7 ± 15.7), scores were lower. Disability scores were, generally, proportional to the PH severity. The main baseline correlates of disability were World Health Organisation (WHO) functional class, fatigue, dyspnoea, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Baseline WHODAS 2.0 scores showed significant associations with disease progression. However, this effect was not transversal to all domains, with only a few domains significantly associated with disease progression variables. Conclusions: This PH population shows mild disability, with higher degree of disability in the domains of mobility and life activities. This study is the first one to assess disability in PH using WHODAS 2.0. Further studies should apply this scale to larger PH populations with suitable representations of more severe PH forms.